You are searching about The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called, today we will share with you article about The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called is useful to you.
In Search of Atlantis — Getting Closer
Around 355 BC Plato described an ancient kingdom on a strange island, which was buried under the sea when its formerly virtuous people angered the gods and engaged in sin and corruption. The city of Atlantis was a marvel of architecture and engineering. The city had many walls and canals about 9000 years before the time of Plato. When the people of Atlantis became deceitful and greedy, the gods decided to destroy them. A great earthquake shook the land, great waves ran along the shore, and the island sank into the sea, so that it was no longer seen. In Plato’s book, Timaeus, a man named Kritias explains that the story of Atlantis has been in his family for generations. According to this behavior, an Egyptian priest told his ancestor, Solon.
The first thing to note is that it would be surprising if the description of Atlantis by Plato is accurate and correct, not because Plato was not correct, but because the story passed over thousands of years, first in words and not in writing. This explanation reached Plato through the Egyptian Priests. It would be difficult to pinpoint the exact date of the fall of Atlantis for the same reason. However there is little doubt that any truth in this story would be before 3300 BC. There is no example of a written description before 3300 BC. Some evidence of writing short descriptions with illustrations of goods is all that exists in written form from as early as 3300 BC. Names, sizes and durations are made up or modified as this article has been presented over the years.
The essentials of this story, of a well-planned and prosperous ancient city that preceded the world’s known civilizations may be true. In fact, archaeologists and historians say that there was such a civilization. Cities organized by other technologies suddenly began to spring up in the Indus Valley, Mesopotamia and Egypt in the years 3500-3000 BC as if they had descended from heaven. Since the design and construction of these cities involved engineering skills that took time to develop, people are suspected to have come from a civilization that has yet to be discovered. There are different theories about where Atlantis might be from Antarctica to South America and even other planets.
The proper investigation is to find out where the Egyptian priests got the story of Atlantis. The most popular method is Sumer or Ancient Mesopotamia. There is also the possibility that the first Egyptian priests were Sumerian-Akkadians. The first royal pharaoh of Egypt – Menes united upper and lower Egypt, and built a new capital at Memphis by diverting part of the Nile. The engineering skills necessary for all of this seem to have come from Mesopotamia. It takes a lot of time and study to become a good engineer even if you are very smart. There is no evidence of these skills existing in Egypt before Menes (or Manasseh, the Egyptians did not write vowels and this should be considered). Menes and his priests and engineers were probably all Mesopotamian, although the workers were local. In any case, even if it is argued that Menes and his engineers were not from Mesopotamia, it cannot be denied that ancient Egypt had several links with ancient Mesopotamia that went beyond mere trade.
Furthermore, the possibility of the stories of Atlantis being Sumerian is strengthened by the fact that the submersion of ancient cities was a strong part of Sumerian mythology. It governs their ancient customs. The destruction of the ancient city due to sin was also part of their beliefs. Therefore, there is a high probability that the ancient city of Atlantis is an ancient sunken city of the Sumerians.
If one traces the origins of the story of Atlantis to the Sumerians one might ask who were the Sumerians and where did they come from? They were not local people because they spoke a language foreign to those regions. For a long time, people thought that their language was unique, unrelated to other languages. However, this picture has now changed due to further studies. Studying their language along with the anthropological analysis of Sumerian bones helps to determine where they came from.
It has been found that the Sumerian language is an Austric language spoken by a group of ancient Australoid people found in India, South East Asia and Australia (The Austric Origin of the Sumerian Language, Language Form, vol. 22, no.1-2, Jan .-Dec. 1996.). The study of ancient Sumerian skulls has also confirmed that the ancient Sumerians were indeed of the Australoid race. An evolved branch of the same tribe appears to have established the Indus and Sumerian civilizations after the submergence of their coastal cities. In northwest India they would have encountered Neolithic people from Indo-Europeans where they established the Indus cities. Analysis of fossils from the Indus valley confirms this mixture. The Sumerian language continued to coexist with the local languages as the language of the rulers was Sumerian. In the Indus Valley, the Sumerians would continue to interact with the Aryan languages. Until now scholars have tried to interpret the Indus texts in comparison to the Dravidian and Aryan languages, and have failed. A profitable experiment can be made if they use Austric for this purpose. As in Mesopotamia, the ancient Sumerian was eventually replaced by the language of the majority (Akkadians) in the Indus Valley and then by the Indo-Aryan language.
If we assume that the Sumerians came from the west coast of India and that their ancient capital was sunk, then we must ask whether any evidence has been found. A recent discovery in the Gulf of Cambay, made some sit up and watch with interest. It clearly confirmed the existence of an ancient civilization that had sunk into the sea. The methods of learning that have been discovered, were new and different, in which advanced marine technologies and modern scientific applications of different types were used. Many of the artifacts found in the Gulf of Cambay had many similarities with the Citadel, the Great Bath, grid settlements, warehouses, and many other aspects of the Harappan civilization. But most of the art and typology were distinct and different and the presence of many small tools seems to be much older than Harappan. The northern city has successfully produced pieces of pottery, wattle daub etc. from about 7506 BP onwards. It shows well in the city. So it is possible that the city came after 8450 BP but before 7506 BP. After the fall of the southern city, the ancients seem to have moved and established the northern city. This amazing twin city of Cambay existed from 13000 BP to 3000 BP making it the oldest and largest city not only in Asia but also in the world. Scientists explained, like Plato, the drowning of the city due to strong earthquakes and floods. The existence of a circular underwater port as described by Plato has also been discovered in the vicinity. Also the area has gold, elephants and coconuts just like in Plato’s Atlantis. The existence of other cities in the area may still be discovered through further exploration of the sea.
The important question to ask is that if Atlantis was really located in the Indian Sub-continent then there must be records of it in India itself since India has had records of ancient times. In the Mahabharata, an ancient and well-known Hindu scripture, there is an actual story about the sinking of a city on the shores of the sea that says:
“The sea that was hitting the shore suddenly broke the boundaries that were predetermined by nature. The sea rushed into the city, passed through the streets of the beautiful city. Even as they all watched, Arjuna saw the beautiful buildings sinking one by one. now it is as calm as the sea. There was no part of the beautiful city that the Pandavas loved so much. Dwaraka was just a name; just a memory.”
What is important to note here is that this city is described by Arjuna of Aryan as the city of Krishna which was black like the blacks of Sumer. So based on this research the author feels that ancient Atlantis is a city under the west coast of India. Not all the evidence and arguments of this analysis can be presented here due to the brevity of this article. The actual capital of Atlantis may not have been found yet and may require further exploration of the coastal area.
Video about The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called
You can see more content about The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called on our youtube channel: Click Here
Question about The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called
If you have any questions about The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!
The article The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!
Rate Articles The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called
Rate: 4-5 stars
Search keywords The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called
The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called
way The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called
tutorial The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called
The Prehistoric Language From Which Indo-European Came Is Sometimes Called free
#Search #Atlantis #Closer